The role the DPFU plays


  Extended abstract (of this report) for TOG Meeting, Yebes 2007

by Kaz Borkowski, Torun Station





Calibration idea

 

DPFU-TOG.gif


Source, cal signal and -20 dB levels
Original FS readings are marked in blue

 

Final user takes SEFD = Tsys / DPFU

or simply original Fsys

 

Thus, DPFU is just a scaling factor completely irrelevant to calibration quality


Ø Any change of DPFU would not influence SEFD

Ø Changes of DPFU reflect in Tcal and Tsys only

Ø Attempts to fit DPFU are useless, hence they create confusion

 




The question of Polynomial normalization

(not discussed in the full report)

Poly is used to correct source power Fso for the component of atmospheric opacity and antenna efficiency that depends on the elevation.
Poly is usually normalized to unity at its maximum, which means not well specified elevation.
Thus, in general, every station normalizes their equivalent flux density to different atmosphere.
It would be better to set it to 1 at zenith where all stations see similar atmospheric opacity.

 




Concluding points

v     Disable GNPLT option to fit DPFU

v     Update GNPLT to fit gain curve alone (normalized at zenith)

v     For us, calibration friends, it would serve better if we adopted the equivalent flux densities for primary working quantities instead of the intermediate noise temperatures

 

 



Postscriptum (upon popular request):
An updated version of the good old
European VLBI Handbook
would be welcome by one and all.